Uttarakhand High Court
CRLA/193/2009 of KAMAL BAHADUR SHAHI AND ORS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.1372/09) None is present for the applicants- appellants to press the delay condonation application. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State is present. The delay condonation application is, therefore, dismissed for want of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRLA No.193/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
(Delay Condn. Appln. No.1372/09)
None is present for the applicants- appellants to press the delay condonation application.
Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State is present.
The delay condonation application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Rajeev Dang
(D.V., J.) 29.12.2009