Bombay High Court
APPLN/5857/2004 of SAMIR NARAYAN PRABHUGAONKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 27 December 2004
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5857 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5857 OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5857 OF 2004
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5857 OF 2004
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5857 OF 2004
IN
IN
C.R.NO. 184 OF 2004.
C.R.NO. 184 OF 2004.
Samir Narayan Prabhugaonkar .. Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Shri V.T.Tulpule, Advocate for the Applicant.
Shri D.S.Mhaisapurkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : S.R.SATHE, J.
CORAM : S.R.SATHE, J.
DATED : 27th December, 2004.
DATED : 27th December, 2004.
P.C. :
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.
Perused the papers as well as the order passed by the Sessions Court, rejecting the application for anticipatory bail. Considering the accusation against the applicant accused which is for the offence punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 r/w.34 of i.P.c. and the fact that the solvency certificate which has been produced by the applicant before the concerned authority is found to be fake and bogus by the concerned authority, it is absolutely essential to trace out whether there is any racket or scam in procuring and producing false solvency certificates. At this stage there is nothing to indicate that applicant is falsely involved in this case. I do not think that the facts and circumstances warrant grant of anticipatory bail. Hence application is rejected.
. Parties to act on the ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Shirestedar of the Court.
(S.R.Sathe, J)