Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/1668/2002 of BALDEO RAM TAMTA Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GARHWAL MANDAL and on 23 November 2002
2002 Hon'ble Irshad Hussain, J. Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was in jail for more than 48 hours without any fault and the respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPSB 1668 of 2002
Hon'ble Irshad Hussain, J. Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.
Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned counsel for the respondents.
The grievance of the petitioner is that he was in jail for more than 48 hours without any fault and the respondent authorities were expected to resort to the provisions of Rule (4)(3)(b) of the U.P.Government Servant(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999. The representation of the petitioner under Rule (4)(3)(b) of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 is pending disposal with the authorities.
The respondent authorities are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2002 contained in Annexure 6 to the writ petition within a period of six weeks in accordance with the rules. With this the petition is disposed of.
(M.M. Ghildiyal,J.) (Irshad Hussain,J.)