Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2250/2001 of MANDEEP KAUR Vs STATE and ORS on 21 November 2002
of 2001 Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Mr. Siddharth Sah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate, holding the brief of Sri Bipin Mohan Pingal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 and Sri H.M. Raturi,learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4. Counsel
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPMS No. 2550 of 2001
Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J.
Mr. Siddharth Sah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate, holding the brief of Sri Bipin Mohan Pingal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 and Sri H.M. Raturi,learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4.
Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has died and since the petitioner has died, the writ petition has abated. Even, otherwise there is no merit in the writ petition. However, the judgment and orders dated 26.10.1999 and 16.8.1999 passed by the Courts below are perfectly in accordance with law and are confirmed.
Writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
25.7.2008 Rathour
(P.C. Verma, J.)