Uttarakhand High Court
ITA/88/2007 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEHRADUN AND ANOTHER Vs M/S READING and BATES DRILLING on 26 December 2008
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Sri Arvind Vashistha, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants. Sri S.K. Posti, learned Counsel for the respondent. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that the question of law raised in this appeal, on facts and law, is
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
ITA 88/2007 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Sri Arvind Vashistha, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants.
Sri S.K. Posti, learned Counsel for the respondent.
Learned Counsel for the parties agree that the question of law raised in this appeal, on facts and law, is squarely covered and has already been answered by judgment and order dated 26.10.2007 rendered by Division Bench of this Court in ITA No. 58 of 2006, Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd., New Delhi. Therefore, this appeal is also disposed of in the terms and conditions of the aforementioned judgment.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. Question of law is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (P.C.V., J.) 26.12.2008 26.12.2008 Prabodh