Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1128/2003 of DHARAM VEER and ANR. Vs STATE on 5 December 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 5th day of December 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1128/2003 Order on the bail Application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1- Dharam Veer Jat S/o Late Mahaveer 2- Mintu Waliyan S/Late Teeka Ram Both R/o Village
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONDated: Nainital the 5[th] day of December 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1128/2003 Order on the bail Application of accused.
CRIMINAL SIDE
1-Dharam Veer Jat S/o Late Mahaveer 2-Mintu Waliyan S/Late Teeka Ram Both R/o Village Mukandpur P.S. Titavi District Muzaffarnagar (U.P.) ........Applicants.
Versus
State of Uttaranchal
.....Opposite Party.
________________________________________________________
Arising out of case crime No. 946/2003 U/Ss 398, 401 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Haridwar District Haridwar ________________________________________________________
By the court
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard Sri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Co-accused Raju Kumar been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 1.11.2003. On parity the bail application is allowed.
The applicants-accused Dharam Veer and Mintu Waliyan shall be released in crime No. 946/2003 under sections 398, 401 IPC P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar on their executing a personal bond each and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar.
Sd/-
Dated: 5.12.2003ISB