WP/399/2011 of GYANSHINGH SURANSINGH ABBROL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 3 ORS. on 31 December 2010

1. Mentioned not on Board.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and the learned AGP for the State.

3. The Petitioner in all the writ petitions is seeking a direction from this Court directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to run its establishment till 5 a.m. on 1[st] January, 2011 and permitting the establishment (WP 3007 of 2010)

to organize an orchestra performance till 5 a.m. in the morning. Reliance is placed on number of orders passed by the Division Bench of his Court.

4. After hearing both the counsel, it will not be possible to pass an order or give direction since we are not aware whether the case of the Petitioner falls under the category mentioned in the circular issued by the Government of Maharashtra.

5. If the Petitioner's case falls under the category mentioned in the circular, obviously, he will be permitted by the police. We cannot give any direction. Hence, all the writ petitions are dismissed.

(Mrs.ROSHAN DALVI J.)

(V.M. KANADE J.)