Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1721/2012 of SOM PRAKASH Vs RAJ KRISHAN RASTOGI on 30 December 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 1721 of 2012 Som Prakash. ……….. Petitioner Versus Raj Krishan Rastogi. …………Respondent. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate for the respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Som Prakash.
Writ Petition (MS) No. 1721 of 2012
……….. Petitioner
Raj Krishan Rastogi.
Versus
…………Respondent.
Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate for the respondent.
Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made a statement at Bar that the writ petition has become infructuous, since the tenament in question has been purchased by the petitioner / tenant.
2. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 17.08.2012 stands discharged.
G
(B.S. Verma, J.) 30.12.2013