Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/1215/2003 of VIVEK SINGH DHARMSATTU Vs STATE and ORS on 29 December 2003
of 2003 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Shri Lalit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been called for interview by the Public Service Commission,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.
Heard Shri Lalit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner and learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been called for interview by the Public Service Commission, though he has passed the written test. No statement of facts has been made in the writ petition to the effect that any candidate having lesser marks from the petitioner has been called for interview. Therefore, the petition lacks foundation of the grievance.
In view of the above, this petition is devoid of any merit and is, hereby, dismissed.
Dt. 29.12.2003.NCM: