Bombay High Court
WP/185/2002 of RAVI GOENKA Vs PANDURANG GAWNS AND ORS on 24 November 2003
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2002 RAVI GOENKA ....Petitioners Versus PANDURANG GAWNS AND ORS ....Respondents MR. S.A. SHIRODKAR, Coram:- C.K.THAKKER, C.J. & A.M.KHANWILKAR, JJ. Date:- 24th November, 2003 In the morning, when the matter was call ed out, learned counsel for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
RAVI GOENKA
Versus
WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2002
....Petitioners
PANDURANG GAWNS AND ORS
....Respondents
MR. S.A. SHIRODKAR,
-Coram:C.K.THAKKER, C.J. &A.M.KHANWILKAR, JJ.-Date:24th November, 2003
In the morning, when the matter was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner was not present. Learned AdditionalGovernment Advocate for the respondentno.8 was, however, present. The matterwas kept in the second session. In thesecond session also, neither the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, nor thepetitioner was present. Hence, Petitiondismissed for default.
C.K.THAKKER, C.J., J.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.