Uttarakhand High Court
C482/1466/2013 of Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble V.K.Bist, J. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the fact that the applicant, who is posted in U.S.A., has been granted leave for a very
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
C482 No.1466 of 2013
Hon’ble V.K.Bist, J.
Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the fact that the applicant, who is posted in U.S.A., has been granted leave for a very short period and in the interest of justice, the criminal misc. application is disposed of by permitting the applicant to appear before the concerned Magistrate. In case applicant appears before the Magistrate concerned and moves bail application, the concerned Magistrate shall decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously, if possible, same day.
Let a certified copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, today itself, on payment of usual charges.
Arpan
(V.K. Bist, J.)
31.12.2013