Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1115/2010 of RANBIR SINGH RAWAT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and ANOTHER on 29 December 2011
of 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri B.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for State/respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The claim of the petitioner for regularization has been rejected by the respondents on the ground that
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WPSS No.1115 of 2010Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Shri B.S. Parihar, learned counsel
for the petitioner.
Shri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for State/ respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The claim of the petitioner for regularization has been rejected by the respondents on the ground that petitioner had not annexed any document/ order, which could show that petitioner is working from 11.11.1989. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the tentative list of daily wage employees in Forest Department, Uttarakhand, prior to 1991, in which the petitioner’s name has been shown at Serial No.2239. In the said tentative list, the date of joining has been shown 11.11.1989. This list was filed by the respondents themselves before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Putti Lal’s case.
Since, the respondents themselves have admitted before the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the date of joining of the petitioner is 11.11.1989, the order dated 20.10.2010, passed by the respondent no.2 deserves to be set aside and accordingly is set aside. The respondent no.2 i.e. The Principal Conservator of Forest, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, is directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for regularization within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Interim Relief application (CLMA No.9979 of 2010) also stands disposed of.
Arpan