Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/89/2021 of ANURAG SHANKHDHAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2021
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 31.12.2021 ABA No.89 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, learned
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
|**SL.**<br>**No**||**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---|---| |||**3 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 1**||<br>|ABA No.89 of 2021<br>**Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.**<br>Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned<br>counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C.<br>Agarwal,<br>learned<br>Deputy<br>Advocate<br>General assisted by Mr. P.S. Uniyal,<br>learned Brief Holder for the State.<br>Mr. Navneet Kaushik, the learned<br>counsel<br>appearing<br>for<br>the<br>applicant<br>submitted that the applicant has been<br>granted<br>anticipatory<br>bail<br>by<br>the<br>Investigating Officer.<br>The<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for<br>the<br>applicant further submitted that this<br>anticipatory bail application has now<br>become infructuous.<br>At<br>the<br>request<br>of<br>the<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for<br>the<br>applicant,<br>the<br>Anticipatory Bail Application No. 89 of<br>2021 is dismissed as infructuous.<br> **( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.)**<br>**3 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 1**<br>Neha|