Bombay High Court

BA/832/2012 of MANOJ S/O CHANDRAKANT VIRKHARE ( IN JAIL) Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA P.S.O. on 28 December 2012

COURT

1 ba832.12.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.832 OF 2012

(MANOJ CHANDRAKANT VIRKHARE..VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO SONEGAON, NAGPUR.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM: M.L.TAHALIYANI, J.DATED:DECEMBER 28, 2012.

MISC. CRI.APPLN. NO. 2012

Heard Mr.D.V.Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant / complainant, Mr. R.M. Patwardhan, learned counsel for the original applicant and Mr. Nayak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent/ State.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The applicant is permitted to intervene and assist the prosecution in the matter.

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

CRI.APPLN. (BA) NO. 832/2012.

Heard Mr.R.M.Patwardhan, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Nayak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent /State and Mr. D.V. Chauhan, learned counsel for complainant-InterGlobe Aviation Limited.

The applicant is in jail in connection with Crime No. 3568 of 2012 of Sonegaon Police Station of Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(a) of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 read with Section 336 of the Indian Penal Code.

Though the offence is of serious nature, the damage caused to the airlines was minor. In any event, the applicant has compensated the airlines and the airlines has no grievance against the applicant.

Page 1 of 2

Learned counsel Mr. D.V. Chauhan appears for the airlines and he submits that the matter is settled amicably and the airlines has received compensation as per their demand.

The applicant is in jail since last more than forty days. Investigation is almost completed. There is no antecedents of any nature against the applicant. He is a businessman. Hence, I pass the following order.

The applicant be released on bail in the sum of rupees twenty five thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount, in First Information Report No.3568 of 2012 of Sonegaon Police Station, Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(a) of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 read with Section 336 of the Indian Penal Code.

Hamdast granted.

JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead