Uttarakhand High Court
LWPMS/518/2003 of SUKHPAL SINGH Vs P.O. LABOUR COURT and ORS on 6 December 2003
OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (Lodge) No. 518 of 2003 Sukhpal Singh, S/o Ram Diya, R/o Vilalge Ikkar, and Post Ambuwalla, District Haridwar. ….. Petitioner. Vs. 1. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Haridwar. 2. State of Uttaranchal, through the Deputy Director Sericulture
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (Lodge) No. 518 of 2003
Sukhpal Singh, S/o Ram Diya, R/o Vilalge Ikkar, and Post Ambuwalla, District Haridwar.
…..
Petitioner.
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Presiding Officer, Labour
Court, Haridwar.
2. State of Uttaranchal, through the Deputy Director Sericulture Dehradun.
3. District Sericulture Officer,
Patthri, Post Ambuwalla, District Haridwar.
…Respondents.
Counsel for the petitioner Shri C.K. Sharma Dated:-6-12-2003
Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.
By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ petition in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to comply the award of the labour court.
The writ petition against the order of the labour court being writ petition no.1107/2003(M/S) has already been disposed of by confirming the reinstatement order, and as such no further orders are required in the present writ petition.
Respondents are directed to execute the order of the labour court in accordance with law forthwith.
Subject to the aforesaid observations the writ petition is dismissed.
(Rajesh Tandon, J.)
6.12.2003Mohit