Bombay High Court
WP/314/2005 of M/S. TULSI SYNTHETICS AND ORS. Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 30 December 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.3527 OF 2004
M/s. Tulsi Synthetics and ors. .. Petitioners.
versus
State Bank of India .. Respondent
Mr. Ajit Kanekar with Mr. K. Sundaram i/b. Paras Kuhad and Associates for the plaintiffs.
Mr.Utangalei/b. Utangale and co. for the respondents.
CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.
(VACATION JUDGE)
(VACATION JUDGE)DATE : 30TH DECEMBER, 2004.
DATE : 30TH DECEMBER, 2004.
P.C :
P.C :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the consent of the parties the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. The following order is passed with the consent of the parties.
i) The petitioner will pay the costs of
:2:
Rs.30,000/- as directed by the D.R.T. on or before 3.1.2005.
ii) It is made clear that in the event of failure on part of the petitioner to make the payment of the costs the petition shall stand dismissed.
iii) The petitioner will appear before the D.R.T. on 5.1.2005 and the petitioner will not seek any adjournment in the matter. The learned D.R.T. is further requested to fix the date of the hearing on which the petitioner will advance his arguments on merits of the case.
iv) The learned member of the D.R.T.-3
will hear the petitioner on merits in O.A.NO.
3191 of 1999 and thereafter pass the final judgement in the matter. The order of the learned D.R.T. closing the matter for :3:
judgment is set aside.
v) The petition is disposed of
accordingly with no order as to costs.
sd/-
**********