Bombay High Court
CAA/1224/2006 of SMT. LILAVATI KRISHNA SHETTY Vs MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR on 29 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2006
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2006
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1224 OF 2006
IN
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 875 OF 2006
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 875 OF 2006
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 875 OF 2006
Smt. Lilavati Krishna Shetty .... Applicant
Versus
Mumbai Metropolitan Region .... Respondents Development Authority & Anr.
Mr. A.M. Sarangi for the Applicant
Mr. Kuldeep Patil for Respondent No. 1.
Ms. Nisha Dabhade for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 29TH DECEMBER 2006
DATE : 29TH DECEMBER 2006
DATE : 29TH DECEMBER 2006
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1) Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the portion of the premises in question is already demolished by the Appellant, as assured to this Court. In view of the said compliance, Civil Application does not servive and the same is disposed of.
2) Matter to come up before the Regular Court on 15th January 2007.
(A.P. DESHPANDE, J.)
(A.P. DESHPANDE, J.)