Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2970/2013 of Concept Agro. India Ltd, New Delhi Vs State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS on 31 December 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2970 of 2013 Concept Agro India Limited. ……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. …………Respondents. Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (MS) No. 2970 of 2013
Concept Agro India Limited. ……….. Petitioner State of Uttarakhand & others.
Versus
…………Respondents.
Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents.
Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.
So far as the prayer No. 1 is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the same. The writ petition, so far as the prayer No. 1 is concerned, is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
2. So far as the prayer No. 2 is concerned, a writ in the nature of mandamus has been sought by the petitioner to command respondent No. 3 to decide the Application dated 11.04.2011 as expeditiously as possible. The said Application has been made by the petitioner regarding some wrong entry, which has been made in his Khata No. 32.
3. The prayer, as made, seems to be innocuous. Therefore, it is directed that the Application dated 11.04.2011 (Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition) be decided in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
G
(B.S. Verma, J.) 31.12.2013