Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1279/2009 of MUKESH AND ANR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1279 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mukesh & Another .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ……
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONDated: Nainital: the 31[st] day of December, 2009Ist Bail Application No.1279 of 2009Order on the Bail application of accused.
CRIMINAL SIDE
Mukesh & Another .….Applicants (In jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand……Opposite Party
___________________________________________________________________
Arising out of Case Crime No 1776of 2009,U/s 363, 366-A IPC, PS Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal.
_______________________________________________________________
December 31, 2009
HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J.
Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the accused applicants.
Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. with Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State.
Heard.
In brief, the prosecution case is that Km. Deepa had gone from her house along with the accused applicants on 25.8.2009. She was seen in Rishkesh on 26.8.2009 by Kunwar Singh Rana. On the basis of this information, FIR was lodged on 27.8.2009 at 2 am with PS Narendra Nagar. Learned Counsel for the accused applicants submitted that Km. Deepa has been shown to be recovered from the Roadways Tiraha, Rishikesh along with the accused applicants. He has further submitted that the age of Km. Deepa has been shown to be above 18 years after her medical examination. No leaving or dead spermatozoa was found in her vaginal smear and no definite opinion about the rape could be given in the medical report. He further submitted that the contents of FIR, medical report and recovery memo indicate that Km. Deepa was a consented party and was major on the date of incident and she had gone along with the accused applicants with her own consent.
Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR, medical report, recovery memo and other papers available on record and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage.
Let the applicant Mukesh and Smt. Bimla Devi be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each of them and furnishing of two sureties, each in like amount, by each of them to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned.
Bail application is allowed accordingly.
(Dharam Veer, J.)
31.12.2009
PRABODH