Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/958/2003 of ARIF Vs STATE and ORS. on 15 October 2003
HIGH COURT OF UTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 958 of 2003 Arif, S/o Sarfuddin, R/o Mohalla Purva Faiyaj Ali, Opposite Municipality Board, P.S. Delhi Gate, Distt. Meerut ---Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & Others ----Respondent. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Criminal Writ Petition No. 958 of 2003
Arif, S/o Sarfuddin, R/o Mohalla Purva Faiyaj Ali, Opposite Municipality Board, P.S. Delhi Gate, Distt. Meerut
Versus
---Petitioner
State of Uttaranchal & Others
----Respondent.
Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.P.S.Panwar, Government Advocate for the State.
Coram: Hon. S.H.Kapadia, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J.
PC:
Dated: 15.10.2003:
Heard.
Perused the first information report dated 12.08.2003. It discloses cognizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. Considering this, we are not inclined to entertain the petition.
The petition is dismissed accordingly.
AK:
(Irshad Hussain, J.) (S.H.Kapadia, C.J.)