Bombay High Court

FA/1547/2003 of M/S. RIZVI LAND DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. Vs PAUL CARVALHO and OTHERS on 12 December 2003

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVILCIVILCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARADFARADFARAD CONTINUNATION SHEETCONTINUNATION SHEETCONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONFARADCONTINUNATION SHEETFIRST APPEAL NO.1008 OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO. 431 OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO. 917 OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO. 943 OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO.1089 OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO. 706 OF 1996,FIRST APPEAL NO. 809 OF 1996,FIRST APPEAL NO. 9 OF 1997,FIRST APPEAL NO. 439 OF 1997,FIRST APPEAL NO. 727 OF 1997,FIRST APPEAL NO. 1194 OF 1997,FIRST APPEAL NO. 32 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 46 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 76 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 92 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 218 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 237 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 282 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 518 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 520 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 591 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 590 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 598 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO. 612 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO.1005 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO.182 OF 1998,FIRST APPEAL NO.719 OF 1999,FIRST APPEAL NO.933 OF 1999,FIRST APPEAL NO.1056 OF 1999,FIRST APPEAL NO.1138 OF 1999,FIRST APPEAL NO.470 OF 2000,FIRST APPEAL NO.852 OF 2000,FIRST APPEAL NO.241 OF 2001,FIRST APPEAL NO.519 OF 2001,FIRST APPEAL NO.585 OF 2001,FIRST APPEAL NO.1207 OF 2001,FIRST APPEAL NO.2 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.97 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.330 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO. OF 1995,FIRST APPEAL NO.991 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1122 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1211 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1235 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1411 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1654 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1008 OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO. 431 OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO. 917 OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO. 943 OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO.1089 OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO. 706 OF 1996, FIRST APPEAL NO. 809 OF 1996, FIRST APPEAL NO. 9 OF 1997, FIRST APPEAL NO. 439 OF 1997, FIRST APPEAL NO. 727 OF 1997, FIRST APPEAL NO. 1194 OF 1997, FIRST APPEAL NO. 32 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 46 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 76 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 92 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 218 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 237 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 282 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 518 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 520 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 591 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 590 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 598 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO. 612 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO.1005 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO.182 OF 1998, FIRST APPEAL NO.719 OF 1999, FIRST APPEAL NO.933 OF 1999, FIRST APPEAL NO.1056 OF 1999, FIRST APPEAL NO.1138 OF 1999, FIRST APPEAL NO.470 OF 2000, FIRST APPEAL NO.852 OF 2000, FIRST APPEAL NO.241 OF 2001, FIRST APPEAL NO.519 OF 2001, FIRST APPEAL NO.585 OF 2001, FIRST APPEAL NO.1207 OF 2001, FIRST APPEAL NO.2 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.97 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.330 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO. OF 1995, FIRST APPEAL NO.991 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1049 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1122 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1211 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1235 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1411 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.1654 OF 2002,

-2-

FIRST APPEAL NO.1758 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.1869 OF 2002,FIRST APPEAL NO.8 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.37 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.553 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.554 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.573 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.636 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.666 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.1168 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.1330 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.1547 OF 2003,FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2004,FIRST APPEAL NO.735 OF 2004,FIRST APPEAL NO.738 OF 2004,FIRST APPEAL NO.1105 OF 2004,FIRST APPEAL NO.40 OF 2005,FIRST APPEAL NO.1384 OF 2006,FIRST APPEAL NO.2073 OF 2006,FIRST APPEAL NO.384 OF 2007,FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2007, FIRST APPEAL NO.1869 OF 2002, FIRST APPEAL NO.8 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.37 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.553 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.554 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.573 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.636 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.666 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.1168 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.1330 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.1547 OF 2003, FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2004, FIRST APPEAL NO.735 OF 2004, FIRST APPEAL NO.738 OF 2004, FIRST APPEAL NO.1105 OF 2004, FIRST APPEAL NO.40 OF 2005, FIRST APPEAL NO.1384 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.2073 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.384 OF 2007, FIRST APPEAL NO.471 OF 2007,

.............................................................

.............................................................

Office Notes,Office

Office Notes,Officememorandum of Coram,appearances,Court’sorders or directions& Registrar’s orders.

memorandum of Coram,

appearances,Court’s

orders or directions

& Registrar’s orders.

.............................................................

.............................................................

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. If all office objections in the Appealare not removed within a period of tenweeks from today, the Appeal will standdismissed for non prosecution withoutfurther reference to the court.

JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead