Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/209/2003 of PRAMOD KUARMA PANDE Vs STATE and ORS on 24 November 2003

COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Misc. Review/Clarification Application No. 9918 of 2003 In Writ Petition No. 209 (S/B) 2003 Dr. Pramod Pandey ………. Petitioner Versu State of Uttaranchal and others ………… Respondents Mr. L.P. Naihthani, Advocate for

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Misc. Review/Clarification Application No. 9918 of 2003

InWrit Petition No. 209 (S/B) 2003

Dr. Pramod Pandey

……….Petitioner

Versu

State of Uttaranchal and others…………Respondents Mr. L.P. Naihthani, Advocate for the Petitioner.Mr. S. Dhulia and Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate for the respondents.

Coram: Hon. S.H.Kapadia, C.J.,Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J.

Dated: 24.11.2003:

PC:

No ground for review is made out.

Our order dated 02.09.2003 is very clear. However, we do not want lack of communication as far as Uttaranchal Pey jal Sansadhan, Vikas Evam Niramn Nigam is concerned. Therefore we are clarifying, though not required, that all entries made by the Accepting Authority, which are down-grading entries should be ignored.

Application is disposed of.

Ak

(Rajesh Tandon, J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead