Gujarat High Court

SCA/3031/1997 of GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs SANJAY JAYANTILAL RAJA on 27 December 2002

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3031 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3031 of 1997

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI

============================================================

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals?

-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONVersus SANJAY JAYANTILAL RAJA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 3031 of 1997 MR HS MUNSHAW for Petitioner No. 1 MR MUKESH H RATHOD for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI

Date of decision: 27/12/2002

ORAL JUDGEMENT

1. Mr. H.S. Munshaw, learned advocate for the petitioner has placed on record copy of the communication dated 16-12-2002 issued by Divisional Controller, S.T. Jamnagar, and stated that, the respondent has accepted the communication and has been given benefits thereunder. It is stated by Mr. Prabhakar Upadhyaya, learned advocate for the respondent that, in view of the communication dated 16-12-2002 as above, respondent does not press for implementation of the impugned award.

2. It is further stated by Mr. H.S. Munshaw that in view of the above, petition be permitted to be withdrawn. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged. No costs.

Dt: 27-12-2002 ( N.G. Nandi, J )

/vgn

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead