Bombay High Court
AO/1333/2008 of MR. THOMAS PAUL RODRIQUES ( DENNIS) Vs M/S. TAJESH CABLE THROUGH MR. PARESH THAKKAR AND ORS on 26 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1333 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2008 IN S.C.SUIT NO.2883 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1645 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1333 OF 2008 Mr.Thomas Paul Rodrigues (Dennis) ..... Appellant V/s. M/s.Rajesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1333 OF 2008
INNOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2008
INS.C.SUIT NO.2883 OF 2008 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1645 OF 2008
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1333 OF 2008
Mr.Thomas Paul Rodrigues (Dennis) V/s.
..... Appellant
M/s.Rajesh Cable & Ors.
.....Respondents
Mr.A.M.Saraogi, for the appellant.Mr.Vinit Naik, for the respondents.
CORAM : SHRI V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. (Vacation Court)
DATED : 26[th] DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The impugned order dated 18-12-2008 shows that the parties are running cable network businesses as per the licences grantedby the competent authority.
3. It is the contention of the appellant/original plaintiff that thedefendants are carrying on such business without having licence. If such grievance is truth-bearing, then plaintiff/appellant is at liberty to move thecompetent authority for appropriate action. No interim relief.
4. Notice of motion is already kept for hearing on 06-01-2009.Appeal is accordingly disposed of. The civil application No.1645 of 2008 isalso disposed of.
5. The observations herein shall not be considered in anyother proceedings and shall not be taken as expression of any opinion.
6. Parties be given copy of this order duly authenticated by theShirastedar of this Court.
( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. )