Bombay High Court

CA/9485/2007 of VIJAYA MADHAORAO RAJPUT Vs STATE OF MAH THRU ITS SECTY and 2 ORS. on 26 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1`

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Civil Application No. 9485/2007 in W.P.No.2421/2003

Ku Vijaya d/o Madhaorao Rajput vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge'sOrders.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande ,J

DATE : 26.12.2007

Heard Mr. Pathan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Dangre, Addl. G.P. for respondents 1 and 2.2.By this application, the petitioner seeks amendment to the petition as well as joinder of parties viz. The Director of Medical Education and Research, St. George Hospital Compound, Near Govt. Dental College, Near C.S.T. Mumbai and The Dean, Vasantrao Naik, Govt. Medical College, Yavatmal, Distt. Yavatmal as respondent nos. 4 and 5. Since the respondent no.3 would not be adversely affected by the proposed amendment I deem it appropriate not to issue notice of this application to respondent no.3 having regard to the urgency involved in the matter. The proposed amendment is necessary for deciding the C.A.No. 9484/2007. Mrs. Dangre, the learned Addl. G.P. appearing for respondents 1 and 2 has also no 2`

objection, if the application is allowed.

In view of the above, the application is allowed. The petitioner to carry out amendment in the petition as well as in the cause title in the course of the day.

Civil Application No. 9484/2007:

Heard Mr. Pathan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the urgency involved in the matter, issue notice to the respondents returnable on 28.12.2007. Mrs. Dangre, the learned Addl. G.P. waives notice on behalf of respondents 1,2, 4 and 5. The petitioner to serve respondent no.3 by private notice by 27.12.2007.

S.O. 28.12.2007

Judge

patle

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead