Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1263/2002 of SMT. REHANA PARWEEN and ANR. Vs STATE on 20 December 2002
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 20th day of December, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1263 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Smt. Rehana Parveen wife of Shakir and (2) Kasim son of Mohabbat Shah, both residents of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital the 20th day of December, 2002
Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1263 of
2002
Order on the Bail Application
CRIMINAL SIDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) Smt. Rehana Parveen wife of Shakir and (2) Kasim son of Mohabbat Shah, both residents of village Rasoalpur, P.S. Afzalgarh, District Bijnor (U.P.)
....................Applicant(s)
Versus
State of Uttaranchal.
........................Opposite Party
___________________________________________________________________________
Arising out of- Case crime no. 25 of 2002, Under sections 395, 120-B, 412 of I.P.C., P.S. Kalagarh, District Pauri Garhwal ___________________________________________________________________________
By the Court
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-accused and Assistant1 Government Advocate.
Ornaments made of gold have been recovred from the possession of the applicants-accused. The property recovered had been identified by the complainant and others. In my opinion, it is not a fit casse for bail.
Rejected.
20.12.02./B.
(Irshad Hussain, J.)