Bombay High Court
CA/218/2003 of SHRI RAVINDRA S. DALVI,CARANZALEM-GOA. Vs SHRI PRABHAKAR G.SINAI KUVELAKAR(EXPIRED) BY L.RS. on 12 December 2003
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2003 SHRI RAVINDRA S. ....Applicants DALVI,CARANZALEM-GOA. Versus SHRI PRABHAKAR G.SINAI ....Respondents KUVELAKAR(EXPIRED) BY L.RS. SHRI NITIN SARDESSAI, Coram:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. Date:- 12th December, 2003 P.C.: Heard both sides. Civil
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2003
SHRI RAVINDRA S. DALVI,CARANZALEM-GOA.
....Applicants
Versus
SHRI PRABHAKAR G.SINAI KUVELAKAR(EXPIRED) BY L.RS.
....Respondents
SHRI NITIN SARDESSAI,
-Coram:A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.-Date:12th December, 2003
P.C.:
Heard both sides. Civil RevisionApplication is already admitted videorder dated 11.9.2003. In thecircumstances, ad interim order grantedon that day to continue tilldisposal of the civil revision application.
Mr. Ramani for the respondents, however,contends that the revision itself is notmaintainable being barred by limitation . That question is left open to beexamined at the final hearing.It is agreed between the parties thatthere is another petition pending in thi s Court relating to the suit propertybeing Writ Petition No.431/2003. In thecircumstances, the civil revisionapplication as well as the writ petitionbe heard together. The application is d A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.