Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1190/2009 of MANNU Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1190 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Mannu S/o Lachhi Ram ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1190 of 2009
Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE
Mannu S/o Lachhi Ram
……….Applicant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
------- Opposite party
________________________________________________________
Arising out of Case Crime No.292 of 2009, U/Ss 328/363/366/506 IPC, P.S. Sahaspur, Distt. Dehradun Dated: December 31, 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and even the complainant Shambhu Prasad has filed an affidavit that his daughter Neha had gone from the house on 12.10.2009 but on 14.10.2009, she came back at the house. He further stated in the affidavit that he took the name of the applicant on the hearsay of some unknown persons. However, after some days, his daughter Neha had informed him that she had gone with her friend and he further stated that the applicant is not guilty in the above-said case.
After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and also on perusal of other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage.
Let the applicant Mannu be released on bail his executing a personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Dehradun.
The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Urgency application No.3591/09 also stands disposed of)
31.12.2009
Rajeev Dang
(Dharam Veer, J.)