Uttarakhand High Court
C24/19/2017 of Smt Priyanka Malhotra Vs Pradeep Singh on 28 December 2017
19 of 2017 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. None turns up on behalf of the respondent while his counsel has been served pertaining to the present proceedings. Previously, repeated efforts were made by this court to have the service upon the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
C24 No. 19 of 2017Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant.
None turns up on behalf of the respondent while his counsel has been served pertaining to the present proceedings.
Previously, repeated efforts were made by this court to have the service upon the respondent by both ways but the report of the Registry dated 28.7.2017 shows that the respondent is avoiding the service.
Service upon the Advocate of the respondent is taken on the record.
The applicant is a lady residing at Dehradun while respondent is residing at Udham Singh Nagar (Rudrapur). The wife has launched some other matrimonial proceedings in the Judge, Family Court, Dehradun which are being resisted on the ground that section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act proceedings have been launched by Shri Pradeep Singh (husband).
In this eventuality, when none is turning up on behalf of the respondent, I transfer the civil suit no. 589/2016 ‘Pradeep Singh vs. Smt. Priyanka Malhotra’ under section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act pending in the court of Judge, Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar (Rudrapur) to the court of Judge, Family Court, Dehradun.
Petition finally stands disposed
of.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
28.12.2017