Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/53/2009 of VIJENDRA KUMAR GARG and ANOTHER Vs STATE and OTHERS on 31 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.11389/09) None is present for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Delay condonation application is accordingly
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPCRL No.53/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
(Delay Condn. Appln. No.11389/09)
None is present for the petitioners.
Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavitis condoned. Delay condonation application is accordingly allowed.
Learned brief holder makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners-Vijendra Kumar Garg and Lokesh Kumar Garg. Averment to this effect has been made in paragraph no.2 of the counter affidavit filed by the I.O.
In view of the above development, the writ petition has now become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with the observation that interim order dated 28.01.2009 passed by this Court shall continue till the charge sheet is received by the court concerned.
(D.V., J.) 31.12.2009
Rajeev Dang