Bombay High Court
LPA/40/2003 of STATUS DEVELOPERS Vs PHIROZE HAVEWALA AND ORS. on 8 April 2003
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Letters Patent Appeal No. 40 of 2003 In Writ Petition No. 5271 of 2002 M/s. Status Developers
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Letters Patent Appeal No. 40 of 2003
In
Writ Petition No. 5271 of 2002
M/s. Status Developers .. Appellants
V/s.
Firoz Havevala & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. D.H. Kapadia with Mr. A. Daimondwala i/b. M/s.
Divya Shah Associates for the Appellants Ms. Nina Kapadia i/b. M/s. Pandya Gandhi & Co. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 5
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP. for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED : 06.12.2005.
DATED : 06.12.2005.
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants, the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 5 and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4. The above Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of by this Court by an order dated 8.4.2003 passed on the Consent Terms arrived at between the Appellant and the Respondent Nos. 1 and 5 dated 7.4.2003.
2. Today the parties have moved this Court for modification of the order dated 8.4.2003 in the sense that the earlier Consent Terms have been slightly modified as indicated in the Consent Terms, which have been duly signed by the Appellant, Respondent Nos. 1
and 5 and respective Advocates for the Appellant and the Respondent Nos. 1 and 5. In view thereof, the
(2) said Consent Terms is taken on record and marked as ‘Y’
for identification. Earlier order dated 8.4.2003
stands modified, in terms of the Consent Terms, which is taken on record and marked as ‘Y’ for identification. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
(SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)