Bombay High Court

WP/16687/2023 of M/S CAPITAL FIBERS PVT LTD THROU. ITS DIRECTOR KUMAR DHARMDAS KEWALRAMANI Vs TJSB SAHAKARI BANK LTD AND ORS on 28 December 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.16687 OF 2023 M/s.Capitol Fibres Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ….Petitioners V/s. TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Ors. ….Respondents ---- Mr.Manoj Harit a /w Mr.Niket Haris i/b Manoj Harit &

NILAMDigitally signed byNILAM SANTOSHSANTOSHKAMBLEKAMBLEDate: 2023.12.2815:08:10 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.16687 OF 2023

M/s.Capitol Fibres Pvt. Ltd. & Anr .….Petitioners

V/s.

TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Ors.

….Respondents

----

Mr.Manoj Harit a/w Mr.Niket Haris i/b Manoj Harit & Co., forthe Petitioners.

Mr.Rajesh Nagore a/w Mr.Vinay Deshpande, Mr.Nikhil Rajani,Mr.Rupak Sawangikar i/b M/s.V. Deshpande & Co., for theRespondent Nos.1 and 2-Bank.Ms.Kavita N. Solunke, AGP, for Respondent No.3

----

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE &SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.

DATE : 28[th] DECEMBER 2023(VACATION COURT)

P.C:-

.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned AGP forRespondent No.3.

2.The learned counsel for Petitioner submits that, Interim Application was filed by the Petitioner before the DRT- III to stay the possession Order dated 4[th] December 2023 as well

Page 1 of 2

as impugned Order dated 6[th] October 2023. The said matter washeard at length by the Presiding Officer but after hearing thematter, without passing any Order, it is postponed to 7[th] March2023.

3.The learned counsel for Petitioner further submitsthat the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are going to take possessiontoday. If this Court remit the matter to DRT-III for passingOrder on heard Interim Application, the learned counsel for thePetitioner, on instructions, undertakes that, if his InterimApplication is rejected Petitioner would hand over the possessionof the suit property to the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, subject to hisright to Appeal against the said Order.

4.The learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2submits that appropriate Order to this effect may be passed.

5.Considering the submission of all learned counsel, itis directed that both the parties shall appear before the DRT-III at3.15 p.m. The DRT-III shall pass the order on the already heardInterim Application filed by the Petitioner, by 4.00 p.m.

6.Considering the peculiar facts of the case, we pass following order.

ORDER

(i) The Writ Petition is disposed of.

(ii) The DRT, Officer-III shall pass the Order onInterim Application by 4.00 p.m.

(iii) The concerned Officer/Tahsildar, Igatpuri shallwait at the property until receipt of the DRT-IIIOrder.

(SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.) (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead