Gujarat High Court
SCA/3322/1988 of KISHOR G GANATRA Vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE on 10 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3322 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3322 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- KISHOR G GANATRA
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR CR ABICHANDANI for MR KB ANANDJIWALA for Petitioners MR MUKESH A PATEL AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 10/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr. Abichandani, learned advocate for Mr.
Anandjiwala, learned advocate is present for the petitioner. Mr. Patel, learned AGP is present for the respondent authorities.
Today, when the matter was taken up for final hearing, learned advocate Mr.Abichandani appearing for learned advocate Mr. Anandjiwala for the petitioner has made a statement that this petition has become infructuous and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the same. Permission to withdraw this petition is granted. This petition shall stand disposed of as having been withdrawn. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs.
10.12.1999. ����(H.K.Rathod,J.)
Vyas