Gujarat High Court

AO/53/1992 of PRAVINKUMAR RAMJIBHAI PATEL Vs HEMENDRA N PATEL on 14 December 1998

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 53 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

APPEAL FROM ORDER No 53 of 1992

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT

============================================================

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- PRAVINKUMAR RAMJIBHAI PATELVersus HEMENDRA N PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV NANAVATI for Appellant MR MIHIR H JOSHI for Respondent No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 14/12/98ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. #. As a result of the hearing and discussion, learned counsel for the respective have arrived at a consensus on the basis of which the following directions are given.

A. The trial court is directed to hear and dispose off the pending Civil Suit namely Civil Suit No.

3204/90 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 31st July, 1999.

B It is clarified that the impugned order is not interfered with and the order challenged in the present appeal shall continue to operate till the present appeal shall continue to operate till the said date.

#. In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal for any further reliefs and the same is accordingly disposed off.

#. The Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 18th December, 1998.

Direct service is also permitted.

*****

pirzada/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead