Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/207/2000 of SMT MANJU RAUTELA and OTHERS Vs STATE and OTHERS on 15 December 2000
of 2000 (SS) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel. Transfer is an exigency of service and no interference is called for by this Court, but keeping in view the fate of the students it is directed that the petitioner shall not be
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
W.P. No. 207 of 2000 (SS)
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel.
Transfer is an exigency of service and no interference is called for by this Court, but keeping in view the fate of the students it is directed that the petitioner shall not be transferred till the completion of the session and after completion of the session the petitioner shall join to his post where he has been transferred within four days.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is finally disposed of.
Sd/-
15.12.2000