Uttarakhand High Court
ITA/161/1998 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ONGC on 1 August 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL I.T.A No. 401 of 2001 Old No. 149 of 1998 Income Tax Application No. 401/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Applicant Vs. ONGC as agent of British Airways Helicopter, Dehradun ………. Opp.party. Income Tax
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
PC:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
I.T.A No. 401 of 2001
Old No. 149 of 1998
Income Tax Application No. 401/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Applicant Vs. ONGC as agent of British Airways Helicopter, Dehradun ………. Opp.party. Income Tax Application No. 403/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Applicant Vs. ONGC as agent of Dowell Schduumberger(W) S.A.Dehradun ………. Opp.party.
Income Tax Application No. 407/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Vs. ONGC as agent of Sedco International S.A.Dehradun ……….
Applicant
Opp.party.
Income Tax Application No. 408/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Applicant Vs. ONGC as agent of Swaire Craneship Corporation, Dehradun ………. Opp.party. Income Tax Application No. 419/2001 Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut ……… Applicant Vs. ONGC as agent of Schlumberger Far East Inc., Dehradun ………. Opp.party.
Applicant
Opp.party.
Opp.party.
Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the applicant(s) Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent(s)
Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia,C.J. Hon. P.C.Verma, J.
Date: 5.08.2003
A short question which arises for determination in these applications under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is whether total income of Oil and Natural Gas Commission/assessee should include payment of surtax, which O. N. G. C. has paid under the Companies (Profits)Surtax Act, 1964.
The main objection of O.N.G.C. to these application is that O.N.G.C. was exempted under the provisions of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 and, therefore, it can not form part of the total taxable income under the Income Tax Act. This question is of some relevance and importance and in our view it needs to be answered by this Court under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Therefore, we formulate the following question and direct the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the matter to this Court at the earliest alongwith statement of facts:
Whether the surtax which stands exempted as far as O.N.G.C.
is concerned by vide of notification from provisions of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 is includable in the total income of the assessee?
As stated above, this is a an important question of law. Therefore, the application is granted. The Tribunal shall forward the statement of case and also refer the question to this Court for our opinion.
Office is directed to list these matters immediately on receipt of papers from the Tribunal.
The applications are disposed of accordingly.
(P. C. Verma,J.)
(S. H. Kapadia, C.J.)
AK