Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/888/2003 of POORAN CHANDRA RAMOLA and ANR. Vs STATE and ORS. on 23 September 2003

COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 888(M/B)2003 Pooran Chandra Ramola aged about 33 years, s/o Sri Bacchan Singh Ramola, r/o Village-Sahabnagar, Distt. Dehradun ………………….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttaranchal, Through Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL.

Writ Petition No. 888(M/B)2003

Pooran Chandra Ramola aged about 33 years, s/o Sri Bacchan Singh Ramola, r/o Village-Sahabnagar, Distt. Dehradun ………………….. Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttaranchal,

Through Secretary, Energy & Power,

Dehradun and others ……………….. Respondents

………….

Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Alok Singh , Advocate for the respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. K.P.Upadhayaya, Standing Counsel for the State.

Coram: Hon. S.H. Kapadia, C.J.

Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J.

Dated: 23.09.2003:

PC:

High power extension lines have been constructed as per the recommendations of High Power Committee appointed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner seeks to change the alignment. The matter is of technical nature. Hence, we cannot interfere. The writ petition is rejected.

(Rajesh Tandon,J.) (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)

AK.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead