Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/3720/2000 of SHER SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 8 November 2001
of 2001 Old No. 3720 of 2000 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Govt. Advocate. Peruse the record of bail application. The applicant is facing prosecution in case crime No. 2 of 1999, under Sec. 302 of I.P.C., Patti Nainoli, Tehsil-Gangolihat, Distt.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Govt. Advocate.
Peruse the record of bail application.
The applicant is facing prosecution in case crime No. 2 of 1999, under Sec. 302 of I.P.C., Patti Nainoli, Tehsil-Gangolihat, Distt. Pithoragarh. He is named in the F.I.R. Role has also been assigned to him.
Considering the facts and circumstances, I find no ground to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The bail application is rejected.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of trial and dispose of the same within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Dt. 08.11.2001
P. Singh
(P.C. Verma, J.)