Rhett Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/7199/2001 of HARISH CH. Vs STATE and OTHERS on 20 December 2001

of 2001 Hon. P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is not aggrieved in any manner, as he has not exercised his a petition for being allocated to U.P. Therefore, there is no grievance of the petition. Thus, the petition is misconceive and is dismissed

Hon. P.C. Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is not aggrieved in any manner, as he has not exercised his a petition for being allocated to U.P. Therefore, there is no grievance of the petition.

Thus, the petition is misconceive and is dismissed accordingly.

(P.C. Verma, J.)

Dt. 20.12.2001

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead