Bombay High Court
CAW/3168/2016 of RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. AND ORS. Vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 30 December 2016
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST). NO.35905 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (ST). NO.35786 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION (ST). NO.35905 OF 2016
Ms.Anjali Chandurkar a/w Mr.Sarosh Bhavnaha and Mr.D.J.Kakaria i/b M/s.Mulla and Mulla for the applicants P.C.:
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. (VACATION COURT)DATE : DECEMBER 30 2016
1Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the applicants, matter is taken on board.
2Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that this court (Coram: A.K.Menon, J.) passed order on 27.12.2016 in Writ Petition (ST). No.35786 of 2016 restraining the respondents from taking any further coercive steps till 5.1.2017. She submits that before communicating the said order respondents sealed their premises situated at S.No.15, 7[th] floor, East Wing, Marisoft IT Park, Builiding No.3, Marigold Premises, Kalyani Nagar, Vadgaon Seri, Pune 411 014. She submits that in the said premises, petitioners main office is cawst35905-16 w cawst35786-16
situated as well as their server is servants are lying there. She submits that in case of emergency they have to take appropriate steps by entering the said premises. She further submits that they have no objection if attachment is continued till further till further orders but respondents may be directed to remove the seal on the said premises.
4The learned counsel for the respondent after taking instructions from the concerned officer who is present in court makes a statement that they have no objection if Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
5It is to be noted that applicants' server is situated in office premises which was sealed by the respondents. In case of emergency, applicants have to take appropriate steps to keep their mobile towers working.
6Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the averments made in Civil Application, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out a case for allowing Civil Application. Hence, following order is passed:
Page 1 of 2
A)Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:
“(a)That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to remove the block and seal placed by them on the office premises occupied by the Petitioner situated at S.No.15, 7[th] floor, East Wing, Marisoft IT Park, Builiding No.3, Marigold Premises, Kalyani Nagar, Vadgaon Seri, Pune 411 014.”
B)Attachment if any, made by the respondents of petitioners' property to continue till further orders.
C)Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…