Bombay High Court

CAW/3168/2016 of RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. AND ORS. Vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 30 December 2016

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST). NO.35905 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (ST). NO.35786 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPLICATION (ST). NO.35905 OF 2016

Ms.Anjali Chandurkar a/w Mr.Sarosh Bhavnaha and Mr.D.J.Kakaria i/b M/s.Mulla and Mulla for the applicants P.C.:

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. (VACATION COURT)DATE : DECEMBER 30 2016

1Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the applicants, matter is taken on board.

2Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that this court (Coram: A.K.Menon, J.) passed order on 27.12.2016 in Writ Petition (ST). No.35786 of 2016 restraining the respondents from taking any further coercive steps till 5.1.2017. She submits that before communicating the said order respondents sealed their premises situated at S.No.15, 7[th] floor, East Wing, Marisoft IT Park, Builiding No.3, Marigold Premises, Kalyani Nagar, Vadgaon Seri, Pune 411 014. She submits that in the said premises, petitioners main office is cawst35905-16 w cawst35786-16

situated as well as their server is servants are lying there. She submits that in case of emergency they have to take appropriate steps by entering the said premises. She further submits that they have no objection if attachment is continued till further till further orders but respondents may be directed to remove the seal on the said premises.

4The learned counsel for the respondent after taking instructions from the concerned officer who is present in court makes a statement that they have no objection if Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

5It is to be noted that applicants' server is situated in office premises which was sealed by the respondents. In case of emergency, applicants have to take appropriate steps to keep their mobile towers working.

6Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the averments made in Civil Application, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out a case for allowing Civil Application. Hence, following order is passed:

Page 1 of 2

A)Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:

“(a)That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to remove the block and seal placed by them on the office premises occupied by the Petitioner situated at S.No.15, 7[th] floor, East Wing, Marisoft IT Park, Builiding No.3, Marigold Premises, Kalyani Nagar, Vadgaon Seri, Pune 411 014.”

B)Attachment if any, made by the respondents of petitioners' property to continue till further orders.

C)Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead