Bombay High Court
APPLN/5425/2010 of SANDIP VITHAL ARSUL Vs THE STATE OF MAH on 31 December 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5425 OF 2010 Sandip s/o. Vithal Arsul .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : S.S.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5425 OF 2010
Sandip s/o. Vithal Arsul
..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Advocate for the applicant.Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for respondent/State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE,J.[VACATION COURT]DATED :31.12.2010
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. Upon hearing the Counsel for the applicant, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for anticipatory bail. Hence, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the applicant is protected for two weeks to enable the applicant to take appropriate steps to apply for regular bail before the competent Court.
2. In the light of above, the police authorities are directed not to take coercive action against the applicant for two weeks to enable the applicant to apply for regular bail.
3. The application stands rejected.
[S.S. SHINDE,J.]
snk/2010/DEC10/cria5425.10
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…