Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1554/2004 of KIRTI PRASAD BHATT Vs STATE and ORS. on 24 December 2004
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Vipul Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 as well as learned Standing counsel who has accepted notices on behalf of respondent no. 1,2,3 & 5. Counsel for the parties has submitted
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WP. 1554(ss)/04
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J
Heard Sri Vipul Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 as well as learned Standing counsel who has accepted notices on behalf of respondent no. 1,2,3 & 5.
Counsel for the parties has submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition has already been settled by this Court on 29.08.2003 in C.M. writ petition no. 677(ss)2001 Lalit Mohan and 11 others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 others, as such, this writ petition may be decided in terms of the aforesaid judgment.
Accordingly, this writ petition is decided in the same terms of the C.M. writ petition no. 677(ss)2001 Lalit Mohan and 11 others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 others, decided on 29.08.2003 by this Court.
24.12.2004: NCM:
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)