Bombay High Court

WP/293/2002 of SULEKSHA APARTMENTS FLAT OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS Vs STATE OF GOA on 2 December 2002

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA **** WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2002 Suleksha Apartments Flat Owners’ Association, registered society under Registration No.11/Goa/96 represented by its Secretary, Shri Sanjay Shankar Nagoji, major, married, r/o flat no.15, Suleksha Apartments, Mangore Hill, Vasco

WRITPETITION NO. 293 OF 2002

Suleksha Apartments

Flat Owners’ Association,

registered society under

Registration No.11/Goa/96

represented by its

Secretary, Shri Sanjay

Shankar Nagoji, major,

married, r/o flat no.15,

Suleksha Apartments,

Mangore Hill, Vasco da Gama.

... Petitioner.

Versus

1. State of Goa,

through its Chief

Secretary, having office

at Secretariat, Panaji,

Goa,

2. Chief Town Planner,

Government of Goa,

Town and Country Planning,

Panaji, Goa,

3. Member Secretary,

Vasco Planning and

Page 1 of 3

Development Authority,

Vasco, Goa,

4. Chief Officer,

Mormugao Municipal

Council, Vasco da Gama, and

5. Smt. Suleksha J.

Parulekar, r/o Flat

No.2, lst Floor,

Sulekar Apartment,

Behind Chowgule Quarters

Maimolem), Mangor Hill,

Vasco da Gama.

... Respondents.

Shri D. P. Bhise, advocate for the petitioner.

Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Shri N. K.

Sawaikar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents no. 1 & 2.

Shri S. D. Padiyar, advocate for respondents no. 3 & 4.

Shri J. Vaz, advocate for respondent no.5.

DATE: 2nd December, 2002.

ORAL JUDGMENT(Per P. V. Kakade, J.)

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents.

The petition is filed by the Flat Owners’

Page 2 of 3

Association to seek redress against the respondents, including respondent no.2, the Chief Town Planner, claiming to set aside the Planning and Development Authority Regulations and to quash the Order of the respondent no.3

dated 26th March, 2002, granting approval to the revised plan of respondent no.5 and for other consequential reliefs.

2. However, today it is brought to our notice that the Planning and Development Authority has issued a notice under Section 50 of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act read with Section 53 and read with Regulation 3.8 of the Planning and Development Authority Regulation, 2000. In view of this position, in our views, nothing survives in this petition as all the grievances of the petitioner can be redressed in the said proceeding,which is to be taken up by the Planning and Development Authority.

disposed of with no order as to costs.

P. V. KAKADE, J.

P. V. HARDAS, J.

mc.

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead