Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2892/2021 of SAI INSTITUTE OF PARAMEDICAL AND ALLIED SCIENCES HAVING ITS OFFICE Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2021
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 2892 of 2021 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Deputy Advocate General,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||WPMS No. 2892 of 2021<br>**Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.**<br>Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate, for the<br>petitioner.<br>Mr.<br>T.S.<br>Phartiyal,<br>Deputy<br>Advocate<br>General, for the State of Uttarakhand.<br>Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate, for<br>respondent Nos. 2 and 3<br>Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate, for<br>respondent No. 4.<br>The petitioner to the present Writ Petition has<br>put a challenge to the order dated 16thDecember,<br>2021, as passed by respondent No.2, wherein, by<br>virtue of the impugned order, the application forms<br>were invited from the students of the 2ndyear, 3rd<br>year and 4thyear, but they have omitted the 1styear<br>students from taking their main external and back<br>paper examination.<br>When the matter was initially taken up, the<br>learned counsel appearing for the University was<br>directed to complete his instructions, as to why the<br>students of the 1styear were excluded from being<br>provided with an opportunity to take their<br>examination.<br>On the basis of the instructions received by<br>the learned counsel for the University, he submits<br>that in fact it was an advertent mistake, which was|
||||made by the Examination Controller, wherein, the<br>students of 1styear has been inadvertently left out to<br>be included in the impugned communication for<br>inviting<br>the<br>application<br>from<br>the<br>probable<br>candidates for taking their examination.<br>Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, appearing on behalf<br>of the University, makes a statement at the Bar on<br>the basis of the instructions received from the<br>Register, as well as Examination Controller, the<br>students of 1styear, who are undertaking their<br>respective courses from the petitioner’s Institution,<br>if they apply within a period of one week from<br>today before the respondents University, their<br>application form too would be accepted and<br>processed by the University in order to enable them<br>to take their respective examination for the year<br>2020-21, for the courses, for which, they are<br>pursuing their studies.<br>Subject to aforesaid statement and the<br>observation made above, the Writ Petition stands<br>disposed of.<br>Let copy of this order be supplied to the<br>parties on payment of usual charges today itself.<br> **(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)**<br>Dated 31.12.2021<br>Shiv| |---|---|---|---|