Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/46808/2016 of KIRAN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 30 December 2016
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46808-2016 Decided on :30.12.2016 Kiran and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present : Ms. Harpinder Kaur Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. G.S. Sandhawalia ,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
Kiran and another
CRM-M-46808-2016Decided on :30.12.2016
— Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK G.S. SAANDHAWALIA
Present ;Ms. Harpinder Kaur Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.G.S. Sandhawalia_ J. (Oral)
In the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thepetitioners seek directions to provide protection to the life and liberty tromrespondents No. 4 and 5, who are relatives of petitioner No.1.
The threat is on the basis of that they have got married on29.12.2016 in Prachin Shiv Mandir, Panchkula. The photographs of themarriage have been appended as Annexure P-3. ©
It has been averred that the date of birth of petitioner No.1 is01.01.1993, as per Aadhar Card (Annexure P-1), whereas the date of birthof petitioner No.2 is 09.09.1995, as per Aadhar Card (Annexure P-2) andthey are major.
A representation dated 29.12.2016 (Annexurre P-4) has beenfiled with respondent No.2 in this regard and, thereafter, this Court has beenapproached.
After hearing counsel for the petitioners, withoutcommenting upon the validity/legality of the marriage or the age of the petitioners and keeping in view the binding precedent of the Hon'bleApex Court in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another 2006(2) SCC(Criminal) 478, the present petition is disposed of with direction torespondent No.2 and 3 to look into the above said representation filed bythe petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law andprovide protection, if so required.
DECEMBER 30, 2016Naveen
(G.S. SANDHAWALITAJUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:Yes/NoWhether Reportable:Yes/No