Bombay High Court

None 1085 of 2012 on 23 June 1987

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYTESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTIONTESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1085 OF 2012

Vidyasagar Gupta

…Deceased

Pankaj Vidyasagar Gupta

…Petitioner

Mr T Salekar, i/b M/s Shah & Sanghavi, for the Petitioner.

PC:-

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, JDATED:

20th February 2018

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Petitioner is the son of the deceased Vidyasagar Gupta, who died on 23rd June 1987. The Petitioner filed this Petition seeking Letters of Administration to the properties and credits of the deceased. The heirs and legal representatives cited in the Petition were the deceased’s widow Asharani, who has since herself passed away, the Petitioner, another son Sunil, a married daughter Latika, who died on 24th August 1996, and her two adult children Prateek and Aanchal. The grant was issued on 12th July 2013.

2. It seems that in his lifetime the deceased purchased land CTS No.307/67B, Plot No.60 of about 7963 square meters at Link Road, Malad (West), Taluka Borivali along with others. He granted development rights to one Sohanlal Melaram Holdings Private Limited, which constructed buildings on that land. The flat owners have formed themselves into three different societies. There is an Affidavit of 6th December 2017 of the Petitioner in which he says that the deceased received the entire consideration in regard to this development agreement. However, he continued to be shown as the owner of that land. The land itself was inadvertently omitted, the Petitioner says, from the schedule of the properties. The societies now desire a conveyance and the Petitioner is agreeable to this since his father received the agreement consideration in his lifetime. However, in my view, the consenting Affidavits of other son Sunil and two children of the deceased married daughter will be necessary. Liberty to the Petitioner to mention the matter and have it listed after those consent Affidavits are obtained.

(G. S. PATEL, J)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead