Uttarakhand High Court
LWPMB/116/2003 of INDER VEER SINGH Vs U.P.F.C. and ORS. on 14 November 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Civil Writ Petition (Lodging No. 116 of 2003 (M/B) Inderveer Singh, S/o Rohtash Singh, R/o Bijnor (Uttar Pradesh) Director of M/s Giri Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Haridwar having its Regd. Office at Indranagar, Lucknow ………. Petitioner Versus Uttar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL.
Civil Writ Petition (Lodging No. 116 of 2003 (M/B)
Inderveer Singh, S/o Rohtash Singh, R/o Bijnor (Uttar Pradesh) Director of M/s Giri Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Haridwar having its Regd. Office at Indranagar, Lucknow
………. Petitioner
Versus
Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation And others
……………
Respondents.
Mr. M.C. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate for respondent Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation.
Coram: Hon. S. H. Kapadia, C.J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Dated: 14.11.2003:
PC:
Petitioner is a guarantor. He is a resident of U. P. He is also Director of M/s Giri Resorts Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at Indranagar, Lucknow which is the principal borrower. The borrowing has been guaranteed by the petitioner, who is the resident of Bijnor in Uttar Pradesh. The impugned recovery certificate is issued by the Revenue Authorities of the U. P. Government. Therefore, substantial cause of action has arisen in U.P. Therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable.
Writ petition is rejected accordingly.
All questions on merits are kept open.
AK:
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)
(S.H. Kapadia, C.J.)