Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1185/2003 of ZAMEEL Vs STATE on 20 December 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 20th day of December 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1185/2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Zameel S/o Yaseen R/o Village Mohammadpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Dated: Nainital the 20[th] day of December 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1185/2003 Order on the bail application of accused.
CRIMINAL SIDE
Zameel S/o Yaseen R/o Village Mohammadpur P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar Versus
.......Applicant.
State of Uttaranchal
..Opposite party.
__________________________________________________________
Arising out of case crime No. 135/2003 U/Ss 364, 302, 201, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar.
By the court
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain J.
Heard Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
There is no direct evidence in the case. Two co-accused have been admitted to bail by the Sessions Judge, Haridwar. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant-accused is admitted to bail.
the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant-accused is The applicant-accused Zameel shall be released in crime No. 135/2003 under sections 364, 302, 201, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Roorkee.
Dated: 20.12.2003Rawat
(Irshad Hussain, J.)