Bombay High Court

S/1155/1993 of SRICHAND VISHANDAS RAHEJAand ANR. Vs ARIHANT TOWER CO-OP.HSG. SOC.LTD. on 17 October 2003

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION

Contempt Petition NO. 26 of 2005

inSuit No. 1155 of 1993

Arihat Tower Coop. Hsg. Socy. Ltd.

... Petitioners

vs.Srichand V. Raheja and anr. . ... Respondents Bharat Vaishnava for petitioners

A. Y. Sakhare i/b. Ranjit & Co.,for respondents.

P.C.

CORAM:A. S. AGUIAR J.Date: 29/4/2005

Contempt is alleged in respect of the order ofthis court (Radhakrishnan J.) dated 17[th] October 2003accepting the undertaking contained in the consentterms , more particularly undertaking at clause 5 of theconsent terms that the Plaintiffs shall constructfourteen open garages in the compound of the said “Arihant Tower” building within one year from the date ofsigning of the consent terms. It is the contention ofthe learned advocate for the Respondents that theRespondents are willing to construct the garage asundertaken, but the construction of the garage by theRespondents is being opposed by the Petitioners and itsmembers.

Learned advocate for the Petitioners statesthat the construction work being carried on by theRespondents in the adjoining plot would make it next toimpossible for the Respondents to construct the garagesin the Petitioner society premises. Learned advocatefor the Respondents maintains that the Respondents willbe able to carry out the construction of the garageprovided the Petitioner and its members do not obstructthe work. However, since the construction will take sometime, the work may be commenced only after the monsoon.Accordingly, by consent, the following order is passed:

The Respondents will start construction of thebasement in the month of October 2005 i.e., after themonsoon and will complete the work be completed within 3months. Within 6 months thereafter, Respondents willconstruct the garages. Learned advocate for the Petitioners state that they will not obstruct theconstruction of the basement or any other work by theRespondents and further they will pay a sum ofRs.10,000/­ per garage , as agreed in clause 5 of theconsent terms.

With the above order petition stands disposedof. No order as to costs.

(A. S. AGUIAR J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead