Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/891/2001 of MOHAN SINGH BIST Vs STATE and OTHERS on 6 November 2001
Petition NO. 891 (M/B) of 2001. Mohan Singh Bisht ……….. Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and four others. ………….. Respondents. _________________________________ Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble M.C. Jain, J. The grievance of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Writ Petition NO. 891 (M/B) of 2001.
Mohan Singh Bisht ……….. Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttaranchal
and four others. ………….. Respondents.
_________________________________
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.Hon’ble M.C. Jain, J.
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that even after negotiation the petitioner has not been given work order for the work to be executed by him fore the public works Department.
The negotiation further took place between the petitioner and the Superintending Engineer. P.W.D.
Pithoragarh. The Superintending Engineer asked the petitioner for the execution of work, if the petitioner was ready to work at the estimated cost.
After this negotiation, a fresh tender has been issued. It appears that the said negotiation was not acceptable to the higher authorities than that of Superintending Engineer. Therefore, the Superintending Engineer has again issued tender notice. Now in view of the fresh negotiation for the tender, it is open for the petitioner to participate in the process and if his bid is accepted, he will work. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner is misconceived.
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
(M.C. Jain, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.)